Monday, 25 January 2010

Film Poster Research (By Kasey Swift)

This is england was a low budget film which was only shown in small, selected, cinemas and became popular after being aired on film four. As it is a low budget film I thought that this film poster would be good to look at to help create our own film poster as it is low budget and aimed at a British audience, like our short film. The poster shows two images which is divided by a white banner with the film title and other bits of key information. It contains quotes from reviews and also the awards it has won . The poster has a colour scheme of blue, red and white which are the colours of the union jack, this links it to the name of the film. The poster has pictures of all the main cast, and through there costumes it sends a clear message to a british audience that the film is set in the 1980's when these fashion trends were popular, the main one we see is the skin heads(which is what the film story is about) and these have a reputation of being violent.

Sherlock Holmes had a large budget so more money will be spent on advertising so that the film will draw in a large audience and make a larger profit. Sherlock Holmes has the popular film stars in it which help to attract its audience. Other versions of the poster of the poster will have been made, which are aimed at different audiences attracted to different genres. This poster also has a colour scheme to it. The poster has mainly the same font for the main bits of texts.

Wednesday, 20 January 2010

Poster Research (By Olivia Davies)

'Shifty' was a small budget film as they were apart of the microwave scheme; the poster for 'Shifty' is simple and doesn't give too much information about the film however it uses the features of:

- Quotes from reviews, and star ratings to sell the film, the use of these help promote and 'big up' the film.

- Used bright, solid, yellow colour, this helps it stand out and aid the title of the film as it contrasts with the black, bold font.

- Image, big - shows the two main characters.

- Mention of actors, to establish and promote who is in the film.



- The black solid line which has been used to represent the 'i', somewhat splits the poster and the two characters, this suggests the difference between the two, and the different lives they have led and the how they have been apart for a while.


The poster, for 'Reign Over Me' is simple yet effective. The poster itself doesn't show too much about the details of the film; the film is a drama about a man who lost his family in the September 11 attack on New York City and runs into his old college roommate, this rekindling of friendship is the one thing that appears able to help the man recover from his grief.
The poster uses a vanishing point image which represents a dust covered NYC on the outer side of the two main characters, and then uses vibrant colours for the two main characters and the background behind them, this suggests the transition of the character going from his state of grieve.
The title and the names of the actors uses the same effect of the image, as they both use the colour scheme of having a black and white tone at the front and then colour at the end, (black and then blue).


'The Tracey Fragments' is a drama abo
ut a girl searching for her brother, In flashbacks and fragments,we see what leads up to her riding in the back of a city bus wrapped in a shower curtain, coming of age, or just surviving?

The image which is used, is very effective as it emphasizes the word 'fragment' as the image is edited to have the effect that fragments are coming off the character's dress, the fragments represents the flashbacks and past of the character.

The poster has the typical features of a poster;

- Film Festival award tags, and quotes

- Tag line

- Actress, director and music producer's name.

- Website

- Production Companies.

- Main Image, Unique selling point.

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Filming Process 4 (By Kasey Swift)

Filming Process
Day 4

Scene: Friends Scene
Location: Locke Park.


For this scene we wanted a netural and open environment so that it looked like a place where stacy leigh and her friends would meet up and we thought that, as Stacey Leigh is a teenager, a park would be a perfect place. In this scene we see Stacey Leigh is arguing with her best friends, this scene shows how Stacey Leighs change because of the abuse and drugs. Filming went well and only took a short time, we had to redo some shots as we were in a public park and there were many people passing by.

Location Shot 3 (By Kasey Swift)


Location Shot 2 (By Kasey Swift)


Location Shot 1 (By Kasey Swift)


We choose this location to film our drug dealing scene. We felt that it was perfect as this under ground walkway is dark and dingy giving the perfect atmosphere for the scene, which is the turning point of the film. Also as we wanted the scene was meant to be filmed at dark this location gave us enough light.

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

Call Sheet 4 (By Olivia Davies)

Call Sheet/ Daily schedule

Item/Title Shooting Date:
Tuesday 14th December

Crew Details
Director: Olivia Davies & Jordan Evans.
Camera: Kasey Swift & Jordan Evans.

Additional crew:
Actress: Rebecca Henstock, Olivia Davies & Kasey Swift.
Actor: Jordan Evans.

Call time:
9:00am

Location:
Jordan Evans House, & Locke Park.

Contacts:
added later.

Schedule:Date/Time ...............Details Of Item ................Location
14.12.09 - 9:20am......Scene: Father's House Abuse.......Jordan Evans House.
14.12.09 - 9:20am............Scene: Drug Taking..........Jordan Evans House.
14.12.09 - 10:30am..........Scene: Friends..............Locke Park.

Estimated wrap time:
9:00am - 11:15am

Additional Information/ Contacts/ Equipment:
  • Props: Small bag of fake drugs, credit card, mirror.

Sunday, 13 December 2009

Research - Opening Title Sequence (By Olivia Davies)


Film: Seven

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3HV6jzMIYo&feature=player_embedded


The title sequence for the movie, Seven, presents an eerie atmosphere through it's choice in font and music, as well as camera shots and editing, as the camera shots are close ups of different objects which gives a sense on mystery, but also the editing which makes them fast paced and distorted. The font looks effective as it looks like it has been hand written or scratched into a surface.

Friday, 11 December 2009

Filming Process 3 (By Olivia Davies)

Filming Process
Day 3

Scene: Video monologue.
Location: Honeywell College Site - Classroom.


In this scene, we wanted Stacey Leigh being the main focus of attention, as the dialogue in which she was saying is important to the film, as it expresses her thoughts and her feelings. Therefore we just had an enclosed environment and a white background so that Stacey Leigh was in focus compared to anything else.
The filming process went extremely well as it only took just over an hour to set up the camera equipment and start recording, the only problem which occurred was interuptions from outside the classroom, such as the banging of doors.

Call Sheet 3 (By Olivia Davies)

Call Sheet/ Daily schedule

Item/Title Shooting Date:
Thursday 10th December

Crew Details
Director: Jordan Evans.
Camera: Olivia Davies.

Additional crew:
Actress: Rebecca Henstock.

Call time:
3:20pm

Location:
College - Honeywell site - Classroom.

Contacts:
added later.

Schedule:
Date/Time ...............Details Of Item ................Location
01.12.09 - 3:30pm......Scene:Video Monologue ......Classroom

Estimated wrap time:
3:30pm - 5:00pm

Additional Information/ Contacts/ Equipment:
  • White backdrop and Chair.
  • Apology's - Kasey Swift did not attend.

Monday, 7 December 2009

Character Profile -Baz Anderson (By Rebecca Henstock)


Baz Anderson (Stacey Leigh's Stepdad)

Age
:56

Appearance: 6foot 4inch, weighs 16st 7oz, has little hair on his head and always has a dirty looking stubble on his face.

Character Traits: very short tempered, bad attitudeCostume: Chavy, Trakies, baggy coat, clean looking

Background:
Baz is originally from Manchester and moved to Barnsley soon before he started a relationship with Stacey Leigh's mum, he is a ex-builder, and due to injury; he lost his job 5 years ago, therefore is now on the dole. Baz lives in a council house in Barnsley with Stacey Leigh. When he's not working he's down at the pub everynight then comes home in the early hours drunk and shouting, then making his way upstairs to Stacey Leigh and starts shouting at her and giving her abuse. Baz is rarely in the house due to the pub and football, but when he is its a living nigtmare for Stacey Leigh.

Character Profile - Extra Characters (By Rebecca Henstock)


Drug Dealer.

Age: 20

Gender: Female

Appearance: Thin, pale, Gaunt

Character Traits: pushy, persistent, doesn't have any care or consideration for anyone.

Costume: Dark clothing, hoody, gloves, hair tied back, hood up (constantly)

Background:

The drug dealer is well known in Barnsley for drug dealing. Has a close circle of friends and has been arrested recently for the possession of drugs.

Thursday, 3 December 2009

Shot List - Final (By Olivia Davies)

START.

Scene 1 - White Room.
Shot 1: MCU - Stacey Leigh.

Scene 2 - House.
Shot 1: (OSS) OVER THE SHOULDER SHOT - Baz layed/sat on the sofa watching television with a can of beer.
Shot 2: CU, (LL) LOW LEVEL - Baz's feet walking from the sofa.
Shot 3: CU, LL - Baz's feet walking through the door way.
Shot 4: CU, LL - Baz's feet walking up stairs.
Shot 5: MS - Stacey Leigh sat on the floor in the corner with a scared facial expression.
Shot 6: MS, TWO SHOT- Baz standing infront of Stacey Leigh.
Shot 7: MS, HIGH ANGLE (paans right,left, right - follows movement)- Baz start's attacking Stacey Leigh.
Shot 8: MS, LOW ANGLE - Baz shouting at Stacey Leigh, and then walks out of the room.
Shot 9: MS, EYE LEVEL - Stacey Leigh gets up from the floor and climbs onto her bed, and continues to cry.

Scene 3 - White Room.
Shot 1: MCU - Stacey Leigh.

Scene 4 - Park, Friends.
Shot 1: MS, TWO SHOT - Friend#1 and Friend#2 walking up to Stacey Leigh in a park.
Shot 2: MS, - Stacey Leigh sat on a bench.
Shot 3: MCU, TWO Shot - Friend#1 and Friend#2 dialogue to Stacey Leigh.
Shot 4: MS, OSS - Stacey Leigh's dialogue to Friends.
Shot 5: MS, TWO Shot, PAN TO RIGHT - Friend#1 and Friend#2 dialogue, and then walking off.
-Shot 6: (from pan to right), MS - Stacey Leigh left sat on the bench, crying.

Scene 5 - White Room.
Shot 1: MCU - Stacey Leigh.

Scene 6 - Drug Exchange.
Shot 1: LS - Stacey Leigh walking, Drug Dealer cuts her path and stops her.
Shot 2: MS, OSS - Drug Dealer waves small bag of drugs in Stacey Leigh's face.
Shot 3: MS, OSS - Stacey Leigh. Then walks off camera.
Shot 4: MS, TWO SHOT - Drug Dealer grabing Stacey Leigh's arm to get her attention.
Shot 5: MCU - Drug Dealer flashing a smile.

Scene 7 - White Room.
Shot 1: MCU - Stacey Leigh.

Scene 8 - Drug Abuse.
Shot 1: ELS/ES - Stacey Leigh on the market stalls.
Shot 2: CU - Stacey Leigh taking drugs.
Shot 3: ECU, CANTED, HAND HELD - Stacey Leigh's eyes.
Shot 4: MCU, CANTED, HAND HELD, POV, OUT OF FOCUS - Stacey Leigh's hallucination's.

Scene 9 - White Room.
Shot 1: MCU - Stacey Leigh.

Scene 11 - Room.
Shot 1: MCU - Stacey Leigh.
Shot 2: ZOOMS OUT - To a television screen.
Shot 3: ZOOMS OUT, PANS DOWN - Shows Stacey Leigh laid dead on the floor in front of the television screen.

THE END.

Script - Final (By Olivia Davies)

BLACK SCREEN.
TITLES.


STACEY LEIGH(voiceover)
Erm my name is Stacey Leigh. I'm seventeen. And I er have a problem. I've had this problem for a while now.

FADE IN .

INT. WHITE ROOM, WHITE BACKGROUND.

STACEY LEIGH IS SAT DOWN LOOKING AT AND TALKING TO THE CAMERA.


STACEY LEIGH
I've had this problem for about, two years now. I can't really remember my life before the addiction. I don't want to remember, it's the reason why it started, and I don't want it to happen again.

CUT TO:

FLASH BACK.

INT. HOUSE, LIVING ROOM.

BAZ IS WATCHING TELEVISION, LAYED/SAT ON THE SOFA WITH A CAN OF BEER. BAZ HEARS THE DOOR THE OPEN AND AND IT THEN CLOSE.

BAZ
Where's the fucking money?!

BAZ HEARS FOOTSTEPS RUN UPSTAIRS.

BAZ
Aseh, where's my fucking money?!

BAZ'S FEET GET UP FROM HIS SOFA POSITION AND STARTS WALKING TOWARDS THE DOORWAY AND THEN UP THE STAIRS.

CUT TO:

INT. HOUSE, STACEY LEIGH'S BEDROOM.

STACEY LEIGH'S IS SAT IN THE CORNER OF HER ROOM AND HEARS BAZ'S FOOTSTEPS COMING UP THE STAIRS AND HAS A SCARED FACIAL REACTION. BAZ ENTERS THE ROOM AND STANDS OVER STACEY LEIGH AS SHE IS SAT IN THE CORNER OF THE ROOM.

BAZ
Where's the fucking money?!

STACEY LEIGH
I dont know...

BAZ
Where's my fucking money?!

BAZ GRAB'S STACEY LEIGH'S ARM (STACEY LEIGH STARTS TO SCREAM) AND THROWS HER CLOSE TO HER BED, THEN PULLS HER BACK WITH HER HAIR AND PUSHING HER TO THE FLOOR, STACEY LEIGH STARTS CRYING. CUTS TO BAZ AT THE DOORWAY POINTING AT STACEY LEIGH.

BAZ
If it happens again, you'll not know what's hit ya!

BAZ WALKS OUT OF THE ROOM.

BAZ
Worthless little bitch!

CUTS TO STACEY LEIGH GETTING UP FROM THE FLOOR ONTO HER BED, AND SITS IN THE CORNER OF HER BED CRYING.

FADE OUT

INT. WHITE ROOM, WHITE BACKGROUND.

STACEY LEIGH IS SAT DOWN LOOKING AT AND TALKING TO THE CAMERA.


STACEY LEIGH
I guess I just needed something to get my mind away from it all. I had no one or nothing to turn to, this was the only thing I could do which made me feel better. This is where my life all changed. At the time I thought it was the best thing ever, I thought I had friends, I thought...

CUT TO:

FLASH BACK.

EXT. PARK.

STACY LEIGH IS WITH FRIENDS.

FRIEND #1
Hey, what's up with you?

FRIEND #2
Yeh, you've been really, I mean like really quiet lately, is everything okay at home?

STACEY LEIGH LOOKS UP AT FRIEND #2 WITH A WORRIED FACE, THEN QUICKLY PUTS HER HED BACK DOWN. CUTS TO FRIEND #1 AND FRIEND #2 LOOKING AT EACH OTHER WITH A PUZZLED FACES.

FRIEND #1
Come on Stacey Leigh, I know something is wrong, and you know you can tell us anything, so just come out with it.

STACEY LEIGH
You know what, why don't you mind your own fucking business! You always like to stick your nose in! There's nothing wrong, so just why dont you just fuck off out of my life!


FRIEND #1
What the fuck you silly cow, all we are trying to do is help you. You know what I've had enough of you being like this, so fuck ya!

FRIEND #1 AND FRIEND #2 WALK OFF, LEAVING STACEY LEIGH.

FADE OUT.

INT. WHITE ROOM, WHITE BACKGROUND.

STACEY LEIGH SAT DOWN LOOKING AT AND TALKING TO THE CAMERA.

STACEY LEIGH
I thought I was alone. One stupid thing, and I just lost it all. It's funny how people can turn on ya, and what things can change ya. I never knew it would do this to me, I never knew it all would end up like this. Twenty quid, that's where it started, twenty quid...

FADE OUT.

FLASH BACK.

EXT. UNDERPASS. EVENING.

STACEY LEIGH IS WALKING. DRUG DEALER WALKS IN THE WAY OF HER PATH AND STOPS HER, WAVING A SMALL BAG OF DRUGS IN HER FACE.

DRUG DEALER
Twenty quid, twenty quid. It's all I'm asking for, right deal. Go on twenty quid, you wont regret it.

STACEY LEIGH
No...I've been through enough without getting into that Shit.

STACEY LEIGH GOES TO WALK AWAY, DRUG DEALER GRABS HER ARM TO TURN HER ROUND TO FACE HER.

DRUG DEALER
Go on, you wont regret it.

DRUG DEALER FLASHES A SINISTER SMILE.

CUT TO:

INT. WHITE ROOM, WHITE BACKGROUND.

STACEY LEIGH IS SAT DOWN LOOKING AT AND TALKING TO THE CAMERA.

STACEY LEIGH
And I did regret it. I didn't listen to myself. I knew I shouldn't have done it. But she kept pushing me, and the more I didn't want to, the more I wanted to try it. To see what happens. I heard it solves problems. I heard it was a way to escape the real world. Would it have helped me to forget?.... That's all that i was thinking about.

CUT TO:

FLASH BACK.

EXT. ABANDONED MARKET STALLS. EVENING.

STACEY LEIGH IS TAKING DRUGS, KEY OF KETAMINE.

(CAMERA SHOTS ARE FACED PACED AND SHOW STACEY LEIGH'S HALLUCINATIONS.)

FADE OUT.

INT. WHITE ROOM, WHITE BACKGROUND.

STACEY LEIGH IS SAT DOWN LOOKING AT AND TALKING TO THE CAMERA.

STACEY LEIGH
I felt amazing. I had nothing to worry about. I finally couldn’t feel the pain. It helped me forget things for a moment, but not to forget for a life time. So I kept having it. It was the only thing that kept me happy. But after a couple of weeks, it started to take it’s toll. I had no money, no home, I quit school, I had nothing.

STACEY LEIGH
I knew that I had sunk to a low. I needed to find help, so I came to you to find it.

STACEY LEIGH
But I knew this life wasn’t my fault. It can’t be my fault, can it?

THE END.

Wednesday, 2 December 2009

The British Board of Film Classification Research (By Kasey Swift)

The British Board of Film Censors was set up in 1912 by the film industry as an independent body to bring a degree of uniformity to the classification of film nationally.
Statutory powers on film remain with the local councils, which may overrule any of the Board's decisions, passing films we reject, banning films we have passed, and even waiving cuts, instituting new ones, or altering categories for films exhibited under their own licensing jurisdiction.
The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) is an independent, non-governmental body funded through fees that it charges when films and video works for classification are submitted. It was set up in 1912 by film industry to bring a degree of uniformity to classifation of film nationally. The BBFC classifies films on behalf of the local authorities who license cinemas under the Licensing Act 2003. The BBFC will not classify material which it believes to be in breach of the criminal law.
The general underlying grounds on which the BBFC exercises the broad discretion conferred on it. There are two guiding principles: That works should be allowed to reach the widest audience that is appropriate for their theme and treatment. That adults should, as far as possible, be free to choose what they see, provided that it remains within the law and is not potentially harmful. When applying these guiding principles, there are three main qualifications: Whether the material is in conflict with the law, or has been created through the commission of a criminal offence. Whether the material, either on its own, or in combination with other content of a similar nature, may cause any harm at the category concerned. This includes not just any harm that may result from the behaviour of potential viewers, but also any ‘moral harm’ that may be caused by, for example, desensitising a potential viewer to the effects of violence, degrading a potential viewer’s sense of empathy, encouraging a dehumanised view of others, suppressing pro-social attitudes, encouraging anti-social attitudes, reinforcing unhealthy fantasies, or eroding a sense of moral responsibility. Especially with regard to children, harm may also include retarding social and moral development, distorting a viewer’s sense of right and wrong, and limiting their capacity for compassion. Whether the availability of the material, at the age group concerned, is clearly unacceptable to broad public opinion. It is on this ground, for example, that the BBFC intervenes in respect of bad language. In assessing legal issues, potential harm or acceptability to broad public opinion, the BBFC takes account of relevant research and expert opinion. However, such research and expert opinion is often lacking, imperfect, disputed, inconclusive or contradictory. In many cases the BBFC must therefore rely on its collective experience and expertise to make a judgement as to the suitability of a work for classification, or for classification at a particular category. There are certain overarching factors that may influence a classification decision at any level and in connection with any issue. These factors are of particular importance when a work lies on the borderline between two categories.

Context
The context in which an issue (such as sex, language or violence) is presented is central to the question of its acceptability. When considering context the following factors, as well as
others, may be taken into account:
• The expectations of the public in general and the work’s audience in particular.
• The work’s genre. For example, a realistic or contemporary approach may intensify the
effect. By contrast a historical or fantasy setting, or comic presentation, may soften
the effect.
• The manner in which an issue is presented. For example, language used aggressively may be dealt with more stringently than the same terms used in a comic way.
• The apparent intention of the film maker, as reflected in its effect. For example, whether • the work is intended to be educational.
• The original production date of the work. For example, outdated attitudes which might be considered offensive in a contemporary work may be treated more leniently in a much
older, and obviously dated, work • Any special merits of the work.

Tone and impact.The overall tone of a work may also affect the classification decision. While the presentation of specific issues, such as sex and violence, may not be problematic at a particular category, if the work has a generally dark or unsettling tone that may
disturb the audience at that category, then it may receive a more restrictive classification. At the junior categories, and on the borderline between categories, such considerations as the degree of fantasy; the level of connection to the real world; and the extent to which the work presents a despairing view of the world or lacks a clear moral perspective may be important factors. The impact of a work (how it makes the audience feel) is also taken into account, for example in relation to horror films where threat may be more significant
than violence.

Release format.
Classification decisions may be stricter on video works than on film. This is on account of the increased possibility of under-age viewing or game playing recognised in the Video
Recordings Act, and of works being replayed or viewed out of context. Accordingly, a video work may occasionally receive a higher classification than on film, or require new or different cuts.


Main Issues.
This section of the Guidelines identifies some concerns which apply, to a greater or a lesser degree, at all classification levels. It sets out the general approach taken with regard
to such concerns, given the general principles set out earlier. The pages following this section provide specific guidance for ‘U’ through to ‘18’ under the heading ‘The Categories’. The guidance there should be read in the light of the more general advice offered here and under ‘Overarching Factors’ and ‘General Principles’.

Discrimination.
Potentially offensive content, relating to such matters as race, gender, religion, disability or sexuality, may arise in a wide range of works, and the classification decision will take account of the strength or impact of its inclusion. The context in which such content may appear also has a bearing on the classification. Works with such content may receive a
less restrictive category where discriminatory language and behaviour is implicitly or explicitly criticised; or the work as a whole seeks to challenge such attitudes, or is obviously dated.

Drugs
No work taken as a whole may promote the misuse of drugs and any detailed portrayal of drug misuse likely to promote or glamorise the activity may be cut. Works which show drug misuse while emphasizing the dangers may receive less restrictive classifications than works that present drug misuse in a neutral manner.
Where smoking, alcohol abuse or substance misuse feature to a significant extent in works which appeal to children. Classification decisions will also take into account any promotion or glamorisation of such activities.

Horror
The use of frightening elements which might scare or unsettle an audience is part of a long tradition of story telling and film making. Many children enjoy the excitement of scary sequences, but, where films are targeted at a younger audience, classification decisions will take into account such factors as the frequency, length and detail of scary scenes as well as horror effects, including music and sound, and whether there is a swift and reassuring outcome.
Older audiences often pay to see horror films because they like being frightened or shocked and such works are classified at an appropriate category to ensure that the young and vulnerable are protected from too intense an experience.

Imitable behaviour
Classification decisions will take into account any detailed portrayal of criminal and violent techniques, and any glamorisation of easily accessible weapons, such as knives. Works which portray anti-social behaviour (for example, bullying) uncritically are likely to receive a more restrictive classification. Works which, taken asa whole, actively promote illegal behaviour will be cut or rejected. Portrayals of potentially dangerous behaviour (especially relating to hanging, suicide and self-harm) which children and young people are likely to copy, will be cut if a more restrictive classification is not appropriate.

Language
Many people are offended, some of them deeply, by bad language. This may include the use of expletives with a sexual, religious or racial association, offensive language about minority groups and commonly understood rude gestures. The extent of that offence may vary according to age, gender, race, background, beliefs and expectations brought by viewers to the work, as well as the context in which the word, expression or gesture is used.
For these reasons, it is impossible to set out comprehensive lists of words, expressions or gestures which are acceptable at each category. The advice at different classification levels, therefore, provides general guidance taking account of the views expressed in public consultation exercises.

Nudity
Natural nudity with no sexual context is acceptable at all classification levels, but will not occur more than occasionally in the lowest category. Nudity with a sexual context will receive a more restrictive classification and strong detail in such a context will only be passed in the adult categories.

Sex
The portrayal of sexual activity can range from kissing and verbal references to ‘making love’, to detail of real sex. This is reflected in the classification system, in which progressively stronger portrayals are allowed as the categories rise. Sex works (works whose primary purpose is sexual arousal or stimulation) are likely to be passed only in the adult categories. Sex works containing only material which may be simulated are generally passed ‘18’. Sex works containing clear images of real sex, strong fetish material, sexually explicit animated images, or other very strong sexual images will be confined to the ‘R18’ category. ‘R18’ video works may be supplied only in licensed sex shops which no one under 18 may enter.
‘R18’films may be shown only in specially licensed cinemas.These Guidelines will be applied to the same standard regardless of sexual orientation.

Theme
Classification decisions will take into account the theme of a work, but will depend significantly on the treatment of that theme, and especially the sensitivity of its
presentation. However, the most problematic themes (for example, drug abuse, sexual violence, paedophilia, incitement to racial hatred or violence) are unlikely to be
appropriate at the most junior levels of classification. Correspondingly, there is no reason in principle why most themes, however difficult, could not be presented in a manner which
allowed classification at ‘18’ or even ‘15’.

Violence
Violence has always been a feature of entertainment for children and adults. Classification decisions will take account of the degree and nature of any violence in a work.Works which feature the following are likely to receive more restrictive classifications: portrayal of violence as a normal solution to problems, heroes who inflict pain and injury, callousness towards victims, the encouragement of aggressive attitudes, and content which depicts characters taking pleasure in pain or humiliation. Sexualised violence or works which glorify or glamorise violence will receive a more restrictive classification and may even be cut. A strict policy on sexual violence and rape is applied. Content which might eroticise or endorse sexual violence may require cuts at any classification level. This is more likely with video works than film because of the potential for replaying scenes out of context. Any association of sex with non-consensual restraint, pain or humiliation may be cut.

Titles
If the title of a work incites hatred on grounds of race, religion or sexual orientation, or incites other criminal behaviour; or encourages an interest in abusive or illegal sexual activity, changes will be required as a condition of classification. If the title of a work is likely to cause significant offence to a significant number of people if displayed in apublic place, the distributor will be advised to consider carefully the places in which it is likely to be seen and to take appropriate action, for example by obscuring certain
words on packaging or marketing materials. (This advice is not given in relation to works classified ‘R18’ as such works can only be supplied or offered for supply in a licensed sex
shop.) In extreme cases, assurances on public display of the full title, or changes to the title, may be required as a condition of classification.
Photo or pattern sensitivity, motion sickness and reactions to lowfrequency sound
A small number of viewers are sensitive to flashing and flickering light, or some shapes and patterns, and may experience seizures or other serious physical effects. In addition, some viewers experience feelings of motion sickness or other symptoms when viewing works which feature hand held or otherwise moving camerawork, or which feature very low frequency sounds. It is the responsibility of film makers and distributors to identify works in which such issues may arise and to ensure that, when required, appropriate warnings are given to viewers.
Such effects are therefore not normally taken into account when reaching a classification decision. However, if it is obvious during viewing that the work is highly likely to affect a significant number of viewers, the BBFC may advise the distributor of the need to ensure that appropriate warnings are in place. In extreme cases, assurances regarding the display of appropriate warnings may be required as a condition of classification.

Categories



UniversalSuitable for all.It is impossible to predict what might upset any particular child. But a ‘U’ film should be suitable for audiences aged four years and over. ‘U’ films should be set within a positive moral framework and should offer reassuring counterbalances to any violence, threat or horror.



Parental GuidanceGeneral viewing, but some scenes may be unsuitable for young children.Unaccompanied children of any age may watch. A ‘PG’ film should not disturb a child aged around eight or older. However, parents are advised to consider whether the content may upset younger or more sensitive children.


Suitable for 12 years and over.Exactly the same criteria are used to classify works at ‘12A’ and ‘12’. These categories are awarded where the material is suitable, in general, only for those aged 12 and over. Works classified at these categories may upset children under 12 or contain material which many parents will find unsuitable for them.
The ‘12A’ category exists only for cinema films. No one younger than 12 may see a ‘12A’ film in a cinema unless accompanied by an adult, and films classified ‘12A’ are not recommended for a child below 12. An adult may take a younger child if, in their judgement, the film is suitable for that particular child. In such circumstances, responsibility for allowing a child under 12 to view lies with the accompanying adult.
The ‘12’ category exists only for video works. No one younger than 12 may rent or buy a ‘12’ rated video work.



Suitable only for 15 years and overNo-one younger than 15 may see a ‘15’ film in a cinema. No-one younger than 15 may rent or buy a ‘15’ rated video work.




Suitable only for adultsNo-one younger than 18 may see an ‘18’ film in a cinema. No-one younger than 18 may rent or buy an ‘18’ rated video work.





To be shown only in specially licensed cinemas, or supplied only in licensed sex shops, and to adults of not less than 18 years.The ‘R18’ category is a special and legally restricted classification primarily for explicit works of consenting sex or strong fetish material involving adults. Films may only be shown to adults in specially licensed cinemas, and video works may be supplied to adults only in licensed sex shops. ‘R18’ videos may not be supplied by mail order.

Music (By Jordan Evans)

Instead of making our own music we have decided to have a look at non licenced music which can bee used on our short film, we have found a website last year which we also used for our music in the provious film we created the website is http://www.freeplaymusic.com/

which alows people go through a wide selection of unlicenced music and we are looking for music which is sad and down/blue to fit with the feel of our film. Below are some ideas of what we are looking for in terms of music, also a brief decription of what they sounfd like.

1. Memorial Park - (one we will be using)
Dark piano chords weave a downcast melody. The rhythem although slow gives a feel of impatience, as the blue piano ends it crated a memory of good times past. This piece of music i feel will fit well into the feel of our film.

Analysis of a Short Film (By Olivia Davies)


Sweatbox
Location: Youtube - CopperTreeMedia

Sweatbox is a short crime drama about one mans emotional journey in the back of a prison van; it won Dan Orrells the Young Director Award at an International Film Festival.

The film begins with a flash which cuts to a medium shot of the main character, it establishes that the main character's name is Kevin Murray, as he is having a 'mug shot' and holding up a placard which shows his name, the screen flashes again and cut's to the same shot, however the placard now says the word 'SWEATBOX', (title of the film) and the picture is more of a sepia colour, from here the camera shifts to a canted angle and slowly zooms in, then slowly zooms out to reveal that it is a photo part of a poster from Kent Police on a notice board, which establishes that he is a murder suspect. The background music throughout this scene is very eerie and slow, it sounds like police siren's have been blended into the piece of music, which adds to feel of a police/crime environment.

As the camera pans to the right, a voice over of a woman's voice comes on, the dialogue suggests that it is a judge making their verdict 'Kevin James Murray, you have been found guilty of the murder of Kenny Cunningham, I therefore have no alternative but to sentence you to life imprisonment'; it is distorted and echo's, which suggests that it may be going through the character's head as the camera continues to pan to reveal Kevin Murray sat down, looking calm and contempt. The eerie music stops and so does the voice over, as Kevin Murray looks down, a dark figure walks past in front of the camera. It then cuts to a shot of the character's hands in handcuffs holding a photo, the camera then pans up to his face, looking to the side. The camera then cuts to a staircase where two smartly dressed people walk down, followed by two officers escorting a man in a suit with handcuffs on, he starts to complain about the tightness of the handcuffs, it then cuts to different, hand held, medium close up's of the two police officers and the man who is established as 'Beerman' as he has one like last check. The character Beerman is seen to be a very 'cocky and arrogant' man as he back chats the officers and doesn't conform to the commands of the officers, more over it is suggested that he has been arrested before as one of the officers says 'you know the procedure.' Throughout this scene, the character Kevin Murray is sat down in silence looking down, when he looks up at Beerman, Beerman gives him a wink, it then cuts to them both being escorted out of a door, as the door slams shut it cuts to a medium close up of Kevin Murray sat down and looking down again, with only half of his face lit by a light, this can give the impression that there is two sides to the character, such as a dark side and a good side. Kevin Murray then looks up at a figure (Beerman), walks past him and the camera and sits down.

In this scene there are exchanges of medium close up's of the two character's, Kevin Murray and Beerman, in both shots the lighting is dark and looks like it is only lit by a single light, as on both characters, they are only lit on one side of their face. In the scene, the character Kevin Murray has his first piece of dialogue, it is revealed through their interaction that it is his first time he's 'been done,' however Murray doesn't want to reveal what he's 'done' to be there in the first place, but questions Beerman about his actions; Beerman reveals that he 'got caught with Charlie,' Murray questions who Charlie is as he doesn't understand, Beerman then says 'cocaine, you mug' and makes the assumption that he's 'one of these poncy types,' suggesting that Murray is of higher class compared to him, (however this is seen already as Beerman uses a lot of colloquial and slang language, as well as strong language to express himself), here Murray takes some kind of offense and tells him that he doesn't know anything about him or his family, Beerman's reply is calm and cool 'Alright mate'. Now it is established that the van in which they are in is now moving as they react to the shutting of the car door and starting of the engine.

The moment of silence between the two is broken when Murray asks if Beerman 'So what are you, a drug dealer?' he reply's 'Yeh, some people might call it that, I prefer to think of it from a business point of view,' in this scene the audience can see that Beerman is quite content in what he does, as he smiles and acts smug about his drug dealings. It is later revealed that Murray used to work for the VAT branch, a tax man, here Beerman finds this funny he thinks its a coincidence. When Murray turns the subject of conversation back to Beerman, he reveals that he ended 'up in here' because someone 'grassed on me.' A noise of clashing metal makes the scene cut to a flash back, where it shows fast passed, close up's of Beerman taking, sorting/counting bags of drugs in some kind of room, it is illustarted by a voice over of Beerman. In the flashback, the scene again is very dark and seems to be only lit by one light, when the police knock on his door, the audience only see the dark side of his face as he frantically tries to hide the bag of drugs, when the police break in the door, the light is shone onto his guilty face (MCU) and the camera quickly zooms into a close up to show his stunned expression, it then fades out to white to bring us back to Beerman in the van.

The scene in the van now reveals that Murray is from Maidstone, Beerman says that's he's been there once but said it 'was a weird turn out', this interests Murray and questions him more. Beerman starts to tell a story of a guy who he was dealing to, it then cuts to a flash back. In this flash back, Beerman illustrates his thoughts with a voice over; it cuts to an underwater shot of a girl swimming towards the camera, then coming out of the water to meet a man sitting at the side of the pool drinking from a bottle, the scene is dark again, lit by an orange light, which could a represent a romantic but sinister feeling. It then cuts back to Beerman in the van, continuing to describing this girl and the guy to Murray, Murray becomes more interested when Beerman names the guy as 'Kenny' and starts to throw names out, in trying to remember her name, 'Anna?, Anita?' Murray corrects him and says 'Angie,' this is suggested to the audience that maybe Kevin Murray has some kind of connection with this girl, or knew her, as he has been convicted for murdering a guy named Kenny. It then flashes back to the flash back as Beerman continues his story, later it is revealed that he hears a scream when at the bathroom and that the girl somehow angered the man who she was 'romantically' inclined with, as it shows her being punched and pushed under the water to drown her - this includes close up shots, under and out of the water, however the underwater shots are unclear as it is a dark setting, and the audience can just see bubbles and the muffled noises.

It then flashes back to Murray's close up in the van as he looks concerned and asks 'So what did you do?' Beerman reply's 'Nah, no way was I gonna get involved in that, ha...', it cuts back to Murray's expression then cut's back to the flash back of Kenny still beating up the girl, and Beerman watching from a distance. Cuts back to the van where Murray asks 'So you could have stopped him then?', 'Yeh, there's one way of looking at it, but fuck me, we've all to learn for ourselves,' when Beerman says this he seems uncomfortable and looks like he trying to fight something back, it suggests that he is having withdrawals from the drugs as there is shots of he's hands fiddling about.

Cut's back to the flash back as Beerman continues his story - here the eeire music starts again - it shows him taking a full rucksack of drugs slyly away as Kenny is still trying to kill the girl. It cuts back to them two in the van, again Beerman looks uncomfortable and in pain, it cuts to a medium close up of Murray looking confused, the shot then cuts to a medium close up of Murray's hand digging into his jacket's inside pocket, (as before it showed him putting the photo he had away in his pocket,when Beerman asked to look at it,) and pulling out the photograph and turning it round to show the camera, the audience and Beerman a photograph of two girls, (one being Angie.) The scene then flashes and cuts to the flash back of Kenny forcing the girl under the water, it cuts back to a medium close up of Beerman in the van looking at the photo and then looking up at Murray, cuts back to Murray as he asks 'She look like that by any chance?', it cuts back to Beerman looking at the photo again and then shows a shot of him fiddling with a pill bottle which has been stashed up his jacket sleeve, Murray watched him struggle, Beerman then accidentally drops the pill bottle out of frustration, as it rolls to towards Murray and he catches it under his foot - the eerie music then stops - Beerman looks down at the photo and up towards Murray, it then cuts to Murray holding the photograph towards Beerman, the camera then pans upwards toward Murray's face showing a sinister impression as half of his face is lit, however the shadow's cover most of his face, the screen then fades to black.

Throughout the film it seems to have used a black and white tone to make the atmosphere more eerie and mysterious, this is strengthened with the lack of light, as the light which has been used, looks natural and just highlights important moments such as the expressions on character's faces.

Filming Process 2 (By Olivia Davies)

Filming Process
Day 2

Scene: Father's House Abuse.
Location: Jordan Evans House - Victoria Street.

For this scene we needed a house environment to represent domestic abuse, but also so that we weren't showing acts of violence in public if we out in an open area filming. While filming we were on a time schedule as our actress had other college commitments to attend to, therefore the recording process and set up of equipment was more quicker and focused then usual. We wanted the scene to be as authentic and representive as of a normal home, so showed stereotyped characteristics, such as being relaxed at home on the sofa watching television (The Jeremy Kyle Show) with a can of beer.
The problems that occured, was the spacing of the fight scene, and determining where the camera should be positioned to capture the abuse but also to make it look real rather than organised and fake, aswell as lighting in hallway and staircase.

Tuesday, 1 December 2009

Analysis Of Film (By Jordan Evans)

The calling - Short film analysis

link: http://www.youtube.com/VirginMediaShorts#p/u/12/bHlaqbNNdBA



The film starts with a black screen but quickly cuts to an establishing shot of a bridge, This is back lit, by the sky and because of this you can not see the definition of the people rushing back and forth on the bridge this gives a feeling of mystery, this is accompanied by eerie music, this also adds to the weird atmosphere as we then cut to the titles. The titles take along time to come on and it looks like they have stuck with the feeling of strangeness that the film created at the beginning and they have used a ghost effect to bring the titles in, its like a black cloth sweeping over the words. The titles are small in size and rather than being in the middle of the black screen they are more to the left, again the film is going against the standard titles and i think that up to now the audience are drawn in and they are compelled to watch more to see what is going to happen.


The next shot after the titles is a Medium close up of what i assume to be one of the main characters, as usually they are shown first compared to everyone else, the man is laid on the floor in a pile of rubbish and dressed scruffy and dirty he is also asleep, with this kind of costume i suggest that he is homeless and is currently living on the streets of what looks like London from the first establishing shot at the beginning. Following this is a swipe transition made by someone walking past the camera, i think this is a good transition to use in a film, its a simple transition but gives a good effect to the audience, they use it mostly in action films or horror, to show a quick change of location or time, this leads to another medium close up again of a man but this time is dressed the total opposite of the other man we saw previously, this man is well dressed in a suit and clean, carrying a brief case which shows that he is some kind of business man, The shot soon moves to a close up as he walks towards the camera but slightly to the Right so he passes it at some point. The lighting again is very grey and eerie and the faces of the people are half lit (side lighting) which gives a feeling of mystery about everything also it can show that people have more than one side to them if used in a different context, and the eerie music continues to play but you can feel that it is building up to something. and i must point out that there has been no dialogue so far and the film is half way through the story.


The next shot involves both characters, as he sees the man with the sign on the floor, the sign says "I'm alive you are dead" which when the audience reads this they feel that something is not right with what is going to happen. The shot is a long shot and again sticking with the theme of the whole film throughout they are back lit so no detail is shown, just a silhouette of the men. The music begins to build up as the business man shakes the man on the floor to try and wake him, the cut are much more fast paced now, this shows a sense of panic, medium close up's of both characters and the music is building, the first reaction of the audience i think is that they will assume he is dead, until the music reaches its climax and there is a loud bang and the man who is on the floor opened his eyes at the same time the music clashes well, and gives a dramatic effect to the audience and the film, the shot is a close up and we are fixated on the mans eyes for about 5 seconds while the music calms down, as we have reached the climax.


The next shot is a point of perspective shot on the man laying on the floor panning up to the business man, which gives a sense of power to the business man, this shot suggests that he is the dominant one, as we come to see his face his eyes are fixated on the poor man on the floor, almost like he has been hypnotised. The business man then starts to undress, still with his eyes fixed on the poor man. The shots are jump shots to show that time has passed for example he would be taking his jacket off then all of a sudden he is half way unbuttoning his shirt, i think that the primary purpose of this type of cut is to show that time has past, or that you have jumped ahead in time, so that it makes things quicker to watch, rather than the audience having to watch him undress everything, half way of getting undressed the camera panned to the right behind the man on the floors head, this leads to a black screen for about 5 seconds, then pans out from the left again to see that the men have swapped roles, the business man is now the poor person and the poor person is the business man, i thought this was a really good way to show the change and again you would see them mostly in action or drama films. Following this are a couple of medium close up, cut shots to show the expression of both men, and it finishes showing the new business man walk to the right into the world, leaving behind the other man in his place, this them cuts to black and the finishing titles come onto the screen, the same sort of titles that were used in the first set, i really like these titles and i think that they link well to the feel of the film, because you wouldn't use a fancy font if the film was a horror, so the titles have to link with the genre of the film.
Throughout the film there was no dialouge, i think this was to add to the mysterious feel of the film, the fact that we did not know anything about any characters in the short film, we could only assume on what they were wearing about there personallity and what they do for a living, i think this makes the audience want to find out more about each character, also without dialouge it leves the ending open for the audience to give their own interpretation on what they have just seen, and make it what they want it to mean to them. Although i think the audience would have been slightley disappointed in the end as nothing was revealed about the characters.

Synopsis Of Film (By Rebecca Henstock)

Stacey Leigh (Rebecca Henstock) is a 16 year old girl who's life gets turned upside down after abuse from her Step dad, Baz Anderson (Jordan Evans) who she lives with along with her mother. She can't take it anymore and has no-one to turn to so naivley turns to drugs.

This short story tells on how a girl goes from being abused at home and taking drugs heavly to how she deals with the problems and finding help.

Research (By Jordan Evans)

As we decided to do a drama short film and we also decided that it would be aired on channel 4 i thought it would be a good idea for me to get some information on how they broadcast, and when, in the segment below (which has come from channel 4's website itself) offeres a brief discription of how it work and how the genre Drama fits in to channel 4's busy schedule. Another thing i would like to point out is that most of the new material was from 2002, so i am not sure that they has been any new material, or that the statement below has not been changed since 2002.


~ Drama ~


Channel 4 aims to showcase the most interesting new artists and arts film makers launching a new innovative Arts strand from the Autumn. Shackleton and Sunday will be the highlights of early 2002, major event drama with Britain’s foremost writing, directing and acting talent. The Drama department has commissioned a raft of new work for 2002, including the adaptation of Zadie Smith’s White Teeth, and Bodily Harm, written by Tony Grounds. Channel 4 Drama will tackle major contemporary themes including the Health Service. We are determined to add to our reputation for American long running drama series with similar UK originated drama. We have recommissioned Teachers, our first successful attempt to achieve this. We will also commission a second long running drama series, and make drama a more integral part of the schedule through the year in 2002. By 2003 we intend to have three long running original drama series on screen. The Channel aims to bring late night experimental drama back to the screen with the successor to Dogma, providing an opportunity for new writing and directing talent.

~ The Unloved ~

Liking On from the statement above on of channel 4's recent dramas, that has a kind of link to what we are wanting to portray in our own film is the Drama called "The Unloved" which is a powerful single drama about a young girl growing up in a children's home. Gives an honest and intimate child's-eye view of the care system in the Uk. In some ways it links, but our film has many differences, but without any new material on channel 4's drama, that dosent link to the layout and story we have, this was the best that came up.

Below is an image of the main character in the drama:

~ About a Girl ~

As a girl relates stories about her ordinary teenage life, there is an uncomfortable sense of sadness underlying her easygoing tales. About A Girl was the winner of the Best Short Film BAFTA in 2001. I would say that his short film is as close to our own as possible, from what i have had a look at, it is set in manchester and it is a girl telling her story, and has many similarities to our own, not only is this good to get ideas for the film but i think i will use this film in my analisis of a short film.

Below is an image of the main character:



Next are another few similar films that i have come across mainly though Virgine media shots, below you will see all the informations about the film, sadley i could not get a hold of any inages from the short films so i have added a link in so that you can see what they look like and how they compare to our own film.


Title: Dirty Money
Running time: 02:19

Synopsis:
Dirty Money (Charlene Bastians) follows the life of a ten-pound note. It travels from hand to hand showing a snippet of each person’s life. From bullies to prostitutes and drug dealers to the average shopkeeper this film proves that money cannot always buy you happiness. The world is smaller than you think and for this estate the cycle just keeps on turning.

* Director(s): Heather Lowe
* Producer(s): Heather Lowe, Sian Hockin, Sam Llewellyn Watts


www.virginmediashorts.co.uk/films/film/dirty-money/
Title: Ten Pounds
Running time: 03:46

Synopsis
A college teen, Joe, has fallen into the wrong circles and turns to deception to get money from his older brother in order to feed his habit. After meeting with the friendly neighbourhood dealer, he gets the fix he needs and takes a trip down the rabbit hole except this time it all turns horribly wrong. His brother Tom returns home from work only to discover him close to death; it becomes a race against time to get Joe into hospital as his life hangs in the balance. Will Joe get a second chance at life or has he travelled too deep into wonderland?
* Director(s): Jonathan Mason
* Producer(s): Thomas Flynn, Joseph Flynn & Jonathan Mason


http://www.virginmediashorts.co.uk/films/film/ten-pounds/

Other exapmles include adverts for example the Relaunch of Barnardo's successful Break the Cycle advert, which was aired on TV throughout June 2009. The adver it very similar on what we a wanting to achive so i thought it was inportant to include it although it is not a short film. The company Barnado's have made alot of shocking adverts, and the purpose being that it was aimed to make the audience help the charities and getting the message across hashley and to the point, there are more adverts like this one if you follow the link and have a look in the right hand side bar on the link page.


~ What is a Drama Genre? ~

What is the Drama genre. With a few examples of films from the 1980's & 90's
A drama film is a film genre that depends mostly on in-depth development of realistic characters dealing with emotional themes. Dramatic themes such as alcoholism, drug addiction, racial prejudice, racism, poverty, crime and corruption put the characters in conflict with themselves, others and society.

This film genre can be contrasted with an action film, which relies on fast-paced action and physical conflict but superficial character development. All film genres can include dramatic elements, but typically, films considered drama films focus mainly on the drama of the main issue.

In the 1980s, dramatic film put emphasis on highly emotional themes. Do the Right Thing (1989), Spike Lee's film, and The Color Purple (1985) were full character studies of African American culture and history. War dramas again played a big part as Platoon (1986) showed the horrors of Vietnam. Das Boot (1981) focused on the German viewpoint of World War II. Drama, with a science fiction edge was a theme when Steven Spielberg directed E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982), and Ridley Scott directed Blade Runner (1982)

During the 1990s, Goodfellas (1990) took a gritty, hard-edged look at mob crime. The Shawshank Redemption (1994), which was set inside a prison, had strong themes of hope, as did the Holocaust-themed Schindler's List (1993). Dramas also took a turn with existentialist thrillers like, Fight Club (1999) and the tale of suburban angst American Beauty (1999). Race relationships were a theme in American History X (1998), and the AIDs epidemic and discrimination were the focus of Philadelphia (1993). Comedy-drama was featured with films like Jerry Maguire (1996) and Barton Fink (1991).


Prop Shots 2 ( By Jordan Evans)


Again another prop that is purely based on making the film look more realistic, There is nothing that unusual about this prop and as you can see we did not make this prop like some of the others such as the fake drugs.

Prop Shots 1 (By Jordan Evans)


This is the prop that we used as the drugs for the film, the contents of the bag is actually crushed fizzy sweets, and we think it looks really realistic and is a good additive to the film rather than something that looks completely fake, this as aesthetically pleasing.

Questionnaire summary (By Jordan Evans)



Questionnaire Summary.

My questionnaire was set up with the idea that we had equal numbers of male and female participants so that the results were more easy to record in graphs and we could get a wider range of information by asking both genders which you can see in the first question that was asked. The next question was about age and again we needed this information to see what age group we would be targeting roughly as you can see by the results nearly 75% of the people we asked were in the age group of under 16's we know from this that most young people will go and watch more films rather than people in the 30+ categories, this information will go towards the research into certificates and what certificate our film should be.

The next lot of questions start to get more information out of the participants that took part in the questionnaire, as you can see in the next question that there is a lot of mixed thoughts around the type of genre that people like but as you can see both Drama and Horror genres has equal percentages, so from this we decided to choose for ourselves on what genre the film should be, we chose Drama because we did Horror the previous year, so we thought it would be good to increase our media skills and learn and find out what contributes to a new genre that we haven't yet done. The next question again is a simple one but i think gets straight to the point and most of the people asked have heard of short films, and only one out of the ten asked haven't, this follows on for the next question as both are linked together and yet only six of that nine people that were familiar about short films have actually seen one which was a shock and an unexpected out come, i would have thought they would have been the same as the results from the previous question.

The next question that i want to draw attention to is the one where i ask if you would watch a film around different kinds of abuse?, I think that i worded the question wrong and people go the idea that it was going to be an horrific film about people getting beat up and abused in many ways, but in fact the film we decided to do does involve abuse in many forms, from violence to drug but its like an educational story on not what to do in the situations, but it is shown as a short film, so i think that people would have understood better if i asked, Would you watch a film based around a young girl and her struggle though abuse (violence and Drug)? i think this would have got a better response as it is less blunt ans to the point.


Call Sheet 2 (By Olivia Davies)

Call Sheet/ Daily schedule
Item/Title Shooting Date:
Tuesday 1st December

Crew Details
Director: Olivia Davies.
Camera: Kasey Swift.

Additional crew:
Actress: Rebecca Henstock
Actor: Jordan Evans.

Call time:
1:30pm

Location:
Jordan Evans's House.

Contacts:
added later.

Schedule:
Date/Time ...............Details Of Item ................Location
01.12.09 - 1:45pm......Scene:Father's House Abuse......Jordan Evans House

Estimated wrap time:
1:30pm - 3:00pm

AdditionalInformation/ Contacts/ Equipment:

  • equipment: make-up, can of beer.

Filming Process 1 (By Olivia Davies)

Filming Process
Day 1

Scene: Drug Exchange
Location: Barnsley Alhambra Underpass

In this scene we wanted an affective setting which represented the character, Stacey Leigh at her lowest point, therefore we went about filming when the weather was quite dreary and day light was disappearing, therefore the underpass's orange lighting looked more effective in shots, and highlighting the character's faces, as it was during the hours when the day was just about getting dark.
The problems that occurred when filming this scene was that the section of the underpass in which we chose to film was quite busy, therefore sound became a problem as the public who were passing by made the character's dialogue unclear on camera. Another was the interference of the public who would start talking to members of the group while in the process of recording, as well as shouting comments about the props we were using (the small bag of fake drugs.)

Thursday, 26 November 2009

Film Analysis (By Kasey Swift)

About a Girl
I have chosen to analyse the short film “About a Girl” directed Brian Percival. The film was made back in 2001 and lasts for 9 minutes. The film was filmed and set in the North West England. The film is a drama about a teenage girl who tells the story of her normal life as she walks down the side of a canal, as the film goes on the viewer sees that there is more to the story then the girl telling the audience.
The film opens with a shot of the main character singing a Britney spears song, the shot it’s self is very visual as the girl is silhouetted standing in a field and the blue sky behind her. This shot is the cut to the next which is a medium close-up of the girl talking and walking, she has a strong accent which tells us that the film is set in North West England and also in the backdrop is a built-up area of Manchester. As the girl continues to walk she talks randomly about her family and her desire to become a singer. She monologues about her relationship with her parents whom have split and also hints at a violent past between them “Cun’t tell what wa blood or strawberry sauce” as she reminisces about a family holiday. Also she tells about the singing group she has formed with friends. Through out her speech it is interrupted by scenes showing some of the actual events (Carrying shopping with her mum and sister, in a cafe with her dad and on a bus with her friends singing.)
As the girl continues talking and walking the feeling of the film becomes more and more uncomfortable as the actual experiences don’t seem to match up with what she is retelling. The end scene is quite shocking as the girl throws the carrier bag that she has been carrying through out the film into the canal after stating that she is “good at hiding things”, the last shot shows a dead baby sinking into the canal.

Thursday, 8 October 2009

Call Sheet (By Rebecca Henstock)

Call Sheet/ Daily schedule

Item/Title Shooting Date:
Tuesday 3rd November

Crew Details
Producer: Olivia Davies.
Director: Jordan Evans.
Camera: Kasey Swift.

Additional crew:
Actress: Rebecca Henstock.
Actress: Jaleesa Cook.

Call time:
Meeting cast and crew at 3:30pm in Barnsley Morrisons car park

Location:
Barnsley Alhambra Underpass

Contacts:
added later.

Schedule:

Date/Time ...............Details Of Item ................Location
2.11.09 - 3:45pm........Scene: Drug Exchange............Alhambra Underpass


Estimated wrap time:
2.11.09 - 4.30pm

Additional Information/ Contacts/ Equipment:

  • Film during off peak shopping time and school time to risk interference from members of the public.
  • Be aware of the public emotions when dispalying fake drugs scene.
  • Equipment: small bag of fake drugs.